Get answers to all your questions of grammar, style and format

 
  • Blog
    • Get RSS feed
  • Contact
  • About us
Menu
  • Blog
    • Get RSS feed
  • Contact
  • About us
  • I was told that the modern trend is “less commas”. Is that true?

    Ignore these so-called “modern trends”—they are usually just an excuse for not knowing the rules. Henry Fowler of Oxford Dictionary fame gave us the rules of modern English just over 100 years ago, and they’ve hardly changed since, despite what “they” might say. Besides which, applying the comma is easy once you know what it’s for.

    The comma, the most important of all the marks of punctuation, plays a vital role in preventing misreading and ambiguity. Its use is often described as “to indicate a pause”, but that’s not particularly helpful and is open to interpretation. What’s much more useful is to explain its purpose, which is to denote independence: it separates words, phrases, and clauses that do not rely on nor modify each other—that is, they are independent.

    Look at the sentences in this article: five sentences containing six commas, so far (excluding that one). In each instance, if you remove the word or phrase that follows the comma, it has no effect on the word or phrase that preceded it—they are independent.

    For example, if I remove the phrase enclosed by commas in my second paragraph, the sentence would read “The comma plays a vital role in preventing misreading and ambiguity”, which is complete and true. That’s the standard test for independence: if, after removing it from the sentence, what’s left behind remains complete and true, then it’s independent and takes a comma. The comma has other uses, but that’s the main one.

    When you understand what the purpose of the comma is (or any other mark), applying it is easy.

    Style Guide: comma

    [Editor’s note: At the risk of appearing pedantic, but I know someone is going to comment on it: “less commas” should be “fewer commas” i.e. commas are countable items not a volume or flow (see fewer vs less vs under).]

    Share this:

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

    October 23, 2015 / Tim McAuley / 0

    Categories: grammar, punctuation

    Must I? Should you? They might. Why is there a comma before the “and”?

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Is the abbreviation for million a small m or big M?
  • Do possessive singular nouns ending with -s take -s’s?
  • Is it earned or earnt?
  • Why is there a comma before the “and”?
  • I was told that the modern trend is “less commas”. Is that true?

Archives

  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • formatting (7)
  • grammar (4)
  • language (5)
  • punctuation (5)
  • structure (3)
  • style (3)
  • tools (1)
  • usage (4)
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Style Guides

  • International
  • Australian
 

Recent Posts

  • Is the abbreviation for million a small m or big M?
  • Do possessive singular nouns ending with -s take -s’s?
  • Is it earned or earnt?
  • Why is there a comma before the “and”?
  • I was told that the modern trend is “less commas”. Is that true?
  • Must I? Should you? They might.
  • I was taught never to start a sentence with “and”, but Doxical does it all the time. Why?
  • I thought summarize was the US spelling, but Doxical uses -ize also. What’s going on?
  • How to solve punctuation problems
  • How to make your writing flow

Tag Cloud

Pages

  • About us
  • Blog
    • Get RSS feed
  • Contact

Categories

  • formatting
  • grammar
  • language
  • punctuation
  • structure
  • style
  • tools
  • usage

Copyright © 2015 Documen Pty LtdTheme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org